<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.8.4" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>UCLA Law Review &#187; Discourse</title>
	<link>http://uclalawreview.org</link>
	<description>UCLA Law Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Death of Twentieth-Century Authority</title>
		<description>Authority: A legal writing taken as definitive or decisive; esp., a judicial or administrative decision cited as a precedent.[1]

“Respect Ma Authoritah!”[2]

Introduction
The case of Bush v. Gore[3] stands out as the seminal decision that decided the disputed presidential election of 2000.  For legal researchers, it was a herald of a different ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1366</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Picturing the Life Course of Procreative Choice</title>
		<description>Introduction
This Article offers a picture of women’s lifetime exercise of their procrea­tive power in the United States.

The importance of the portrait is this: Rather than focusing on one or another procreative choice or event (such as abstinence, birth, sterili­zation, abor­tion, or the use of condoms, hormones, IUDs, or natural family ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1320</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Support of a Referendum on the Golan Heights</title>
		<description>On December 9, 2009, the Knesset[1] voted to advance legislation requiring that the handover of any land under the administrative and judicial authority of the State of Israel pass a national referendum.[2] The legislation—termed the Golan Heights and Jerusalem Referendum Bill—passed its first reading by a margin of sixty-eight to ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1194</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Case Note: Constitutional Law &#8211; Free Speech &#8211; Ninth Circuit Upholds City Council&#8217;s Ejection of Audience Member Based on Nazi Salute Norse v. City of Santa Cruz</title>
		<description>An irony of American free speech law is that it provides more protec­tion for ranting on a street corner than speaking out at a public meeting.  This is partly a quirk of the United States Supreme Court’s complicated First Amendment jurisprudence and partly a recognition that such meetings are ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1151</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>False Profits: Reviving the Corporation’s Public Purpose</title>
		<description>Introduction
As the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression persists, institutions such as American International Group (AIG), Citigroup, and the now-defunct Lehman Brothers deserve blame for the crisis.  To boost short-term gains, these firms engaged in overleveraging, irresponsible lending, poor hedging, and risky securitization, all without accounting for the ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1056</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone</title>
		<description>A response to The World of the Framers – A Christian Nation?
Introduction
Professor Geoffrey Stone’s Essay, The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?,[1] seeks to state “the truth about . . . what [the Framers] believed, and about what they aspired to when they created this nation.”[2] Doing so will ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=506</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun</title>
		<description>A response to Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone

Professor Samuel Calhoun insists that my thesis is “wrong,” that I “over­state” the evidence, present “a misleading view,” “distort” the authori­ties, argue by “assertion,” offer “no convincing corroborating evidence,” “mislead my read­ers,” and defend a “historically indefensible” position. ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=500</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Economic Benefits of Credit Card Merchant Restraints: A Response to Adam Levitin</title>
		<description>In Priceless?: The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints,[1] Adam Levitin identifies a serious anticompetitive problem in credit card markets—card systems overcharge merchants.  He proposes a bold solution—eliminating the credit card system rules that prohibit merchants from (1) selectively refusing to accept certain cards (the “honor-all-cards rule”) and ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=32</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching</title>
		<description>Introduction
As I stand before you today, I have very nearly finished my twentieth year in legal education.  With any luck, I am roughly at the midpoint of my career, or maybe the five-eighths mark.  So I would like to take advantage of your good nature to look back ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=29</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lawyers, Clients, and the &#8220;Third Person in the Room&#8221;</title>
		<description>A response to Interpreting Communities: Lawyering Across Language Difference

Introduction
Muneer Ahmad’s Interpreting Communities: Lawyering Across Language Difference[1] succeeds admirably on two levels.  First, Ahmad presents a careful analy­sis of a much neglected topic, the role of interpreters in mediating the relationship between a lawyer and a client who must overcome ...</description>
		<link>http://uclalawreview.org/?p=27</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
