COMMENT
Educating Expelled Students After No Child Left Behind: Mending an Incentive Structure That Discourages Alternative Education and Reinstatement
Maureen Carroll* 
55 UCLA L. Rev. 1909

Download Article:
View Online: Westlaw | LexisNexis | HeinOnline |

Abstract

Expelled students have intense educational needs, yet few states protect their rights to alternative education during the period of expulsion or reinstatement to mainstream education following the period of expulsion. Instead of strengthening those rights, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) creates an incentive structure that encourages the exclusion of expelled students from all access to educational opportunity. The lack of educational access for expelled students is a serious concern. Students of color are expelled at rates that far exceed their representation in the school population. As a result, denying expelled students access to education exacerbates the equitable harms caused by racial disparities in the application of school discipline and widens the achievement gaps caused by discrimination and inequality in the school system. Moreover, the widespread adoption of zero tolerance policies has created a situation in which American public schools expel tens of thousands of students each year, often for minor, first-time offenses. Depriving these students of access to education has a devastating impact on their lives, and ultimately leads to public expenditures that far exceed the cost of public education. This Comment examines legal strategies for counteracting NCLB’s exclusionary incentives and expanding expelled students’ access to education. Changes to the implementation of the NCLB accountability framework could change the incentive structure from the top, while litigation challenging exclusion at the school level could change the incentive structure from the bottom. In addition, strengthening the educational guarantees provided by the state constitutions could close the loopholes through which too many expelled students are deprived of educational opportunity.


* Articles Editor, UCLA Law Review, Volume 56. J.D. Candidate, UCLA School of Law, 2009; B.S., Princeton University, 1998.

2 comments to Educating Expelled Students After No Child Left Behind: Mending an Incentive Structure That Discourages Alternative Education and Reinstatement

  • heidi nugent

    Please send me updated information on changes of NCLB’S. My daughter has an expulsion hearing on Jan 30th for a very minor,first time offense, for giving a kid adderall. She had no clue what she was doing.They need to have a better policy and procedure for the ZERO TOLERANCE, as in every child and parent is given a letter to sign and date it. Its in the handbook and the kids swipe their school Id and they dont even read it. My daughter is not into drugs or anything. If they want a ZERO TOLERANCE IN SCHOOLS THEY BETTER IMPLEMENT IT MORE CLEARLY.

  • My son was expelled from school last year. We live in wisconsin. We have not been able to find any alternatives for him at this time. when he is 17 he can get his HSED. But he has even been denied enrollment to an online school due to his expulsion. I have spoke with the WI dept of education and been told the only option is to work with elected officials to get the laws changed. Very frustrated, all my son wants is an education.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>