CategoryDiscourse

Discourse publishes shorter articles that are timely, interdisciplinary, and novel. Discourse strives to serve as a platform for scholars, ideas, and discussions that have often been overlooked in traditional law review settings. Because we seek to publish pieces that are accessible to legal and non-legal audiences alike, Discourse articles are generally between 3,000 and 10,000 words. Like our print journal, Discourse articles are published on Westlaw, Lexis, and in other legal databases, as well as our own website. Beginning with Volume 68, Discourse began publishing special issues of Law Meets World.

December 2, 2020

The Wrongful Death of an Indian: A Tribe’s Right to Object to the Death Penalty

By Grant Christensen
In Discourse
December 2, 2020
25 Min read
02December

Abstract This Essay responds to the execution of Lezmond Mitchell, the only American Indian on federal death row.  The execution was carried out on August 26, 2020 over the objection of both members of the victims’ family and the Navajo Nation.  This Essay takes the clear position that because the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 requires tribal consent to seek the death penalty for murder, or...

November 22, 2020

#SoWhiteMale: Federal Procedural Rulemaking Committees

By Brooke D. Coleman
In Discourse
November 22, 2020
50 Min read
22November

Abstract Of the 630 members of a specialized set of committees responsible for drafting the federal rules for civil and criminal litigation, 591 of them have been white.  That is 9 percent of the committee membership.  Of that same group, 513—or 81 percent—have been white men.  Decisionmaking bodies do better work when their members are diverse; these rulemaking committees are no exception.  The...

November 4, 2020

Judicial Racism And Judicial Antiracism: Retelling The Dred Scott Story

By DeVaughn Jones
In Discourse
November 4, 2020
67 Min read
04November

Abstract This Essay retells the Dred Scott story as a set of intersecting stories about judicial racism and judicial antiracism.  Part I defines racism and antiracism, then discusses how racist and antiracist ideas are realized through government power.  Next, this Essay visits one of the most prominent moments of judicial racial history: the story of Dred Scott.  Part II walks through the...

October 30, 2020

Forgiven, Forgotten? Rethinking Victim Impact Statements for an Era of Decarceration

By Hugh M. Mundy
In Discourse
October 30, 2020
68 Min read
30October

Abstract Laws enacting victim impact statements flourished in the 1980s and 90s, a period defined by draconian crime control measures and mass incarceration.  During an emerging era of decarceration, the effect of victim impact statements on excessive prison sentences has been largely overlooked.  Reshaping retributive laws governing victim impact statements is essential to comprehensive...

October 25, 2020

Rescinding Admission Offers in Higher Education: The Clash Between Free Speech and Institutional Academic Freedom When Prospective Students’ Racist Posts Are Exposed

By Clay Calvert
In Discourse
October 25, 2020
38 Min read
25October

Abstract This Article examines the tension between a prospective college student’s First Amendment freedom of speech and a public university’s unenumerated, inchoate right of institutional academic freedom.  The friction between these interests was cast in high relief in 2020 when several schools confronted dual issues: (1) whether to rescind offers of admission to individuals who later were...

October 23, 2020

When Contact Kills: Indigenous Peoples Living in Voluntary Isolation During COVID

By Sital Kalantry and Nicholas Koeppen
In Discourse
October 23, 2020
24 Min read
23October

Abstract During the global pandemic, people around the world are at risk of serious illness and death from contact and proximity to other people.  But Indigenous peoples, particularly those in voluntary isolation, have always faced that risk.  International organizations have relied on the right to self-determination as the primary legal grounds to justify the principle of no-contact for...

October 6, 2020

Post-COVID Courts

By David Freeman Engstrom
In Discourse
October 6, 2020
45 Min read
06October

Abstract As with so much else in American life, the COVID-19 crisis delivered a gut punch to our justice system.  And the worst is yet to come, as federal and state courts alike are soon to fill with cases reflecting the failing finances and fraying relationships of our sheltered-in-place lives.  But in truth, our courts were already at a crossroads: chronically underfunded, increasingly...

October 4, 2020

Presidential Crimes Matter

By Julian A. Cook, III
In Discourse
October 4, 2020
43 Min read
04October

Abstract The resignations of United States Attorneys Geoffrey Berman and Jessie Liu from their respective positions in the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, and Attorney General William Barr’s and President Donald Trump’s persistent undermining of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russian interference and obstruction of justice investigations and prosecutions are clarion...

August 31, 2020

Law Meets World Introduction

In Discourse, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
3 Min read
31August

Introduction Much has been written on how the COVID-19 pandemic has brought longstanding structural inequities into sharp relief.  Like in all crises, the effects of the pandemic have not been evenly distributed.  Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities have been disproportionately harmed by the virus.  Low-wage workers—largely workers of color and immigrant workers—are deemed essential yet...

August 31, 2020

Ensuring Equal Access to the Mail-In Ballot Box

By UCLA Voting Rights Project: Mindy Acevedo, Matthew A. Barreto, Michael Cohen, Chad W. Dunn, & Sonni Waknin
In Discourse, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
30 Min read

Abstract Mail voting has emerged as the top policy solution to voting amid the COVID-19 pandemic.  But not all mail voting schemes are created equal.  Implemented improperly, vote-by-mail can disproportionately disenfranchise many of the same voters at highest risk of contracting and subsequently dying from the virus.  From voter identity verification to language access, jurisdictions...

August 31, 2020

Letter From The Asian/Pacific Islander Law Students Association Regarding Stephen Bainbridge

By UCLA chapter, Asian/Pacific Islander Law Students Association
In Discourse, Law Meets World, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
50 Min read

The following letter from the UCLA School of Law chapter of the Asian/Pacific Islander Law Students Association was sent to UCLA School of Law administrators on April 13, 2020, in response to anti-Asian statements by a professor.  This was not an isolated incidence of hateful language in the UCLA Law community.  Earlier in the school year, other UCLA Law professors used the n-word in academic...

August 31, 2020

Movement And Crisis: A Social Health Manifesto

By Alejandro Banuelos & Aaron Clarke
In Discourse, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
19 Min read

Abstract In this Article, we employ the terms Health (as a white supremacist mode of being) and social health to demystify how race and health are mobilized by the state and its representative bodies to shift accountability away from their role in crafting an anti-Black world, contain and quell Black protest, and how Black communities have dreamt and practiced alternative definitions of health...

August 31, 2020

Abolitionist Reforms and the Immigrants' Rights Movement

By Shiu-Ming Cheer
In Discourse, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
17 Min read

Abstract This Article discusses the criteria for abolitionist reforms and assesses whether current immigrants’ rights demands move us towards a more transformative agenda, one that questions the legitimacy of the state.  The Article argues that calls to invest in immigrant communities and to release immigrants from detention can be radical reforms that move us closer to abolition if they are...

August 31, 2020

Reproducing Equality: How Covid-19 Can Strengthen Abortion Rights

By Ariane Frosh
In Discourse, Special Issue: Law Meets World Vol. 68
August 31, 2020
45 Min read

Abstract States hostile to reproductive freedom have weaponized the COVID-19 pandemic to ban abortion in the name of public safety.  Relying on heightened power the state typically exercises during an emergency, it can capitalize on public panic to achieve its policy goals.  By laying bare the racial inequities of our healthcare systems and the opportunistic banning of abortion by an emergency...