Abstract Federal law has long prohibited insider trading in securities such as stocks and bonds. Yet many other financial assets—particularly derivatives and commodities—have historically fallen outside those rules. This Article asks why insider trading is penalized for some assets but not others. It argues that the goals of insider trading law are often pursued through alternative mechanisms...
Digital Evidence in U.S. Criminal Litigation: Risks to Racial Justice
Abstract Criminal defendants increasingly face the risks of digital evidence. These risks include intentional manipulation, accidental alteration, and even the threat that visual displays like footage or data visualizations lure viewers into an unquestioning acceptance of events as they seem to have unfolded. Some scholars have deemed the U.S. evidence system responsive to issues like intentional...
The Right to Truth
Abstract This Article argues that today’s anti-CRT statutes, book bans, and “divisive concepts” laws are not isolated culture-war skirmishes but the latest chapter in a long campaign—dating back to the Lost Cause and the United Daughters of the Confederacy—to legislate white innocence as national identity. By sanitizing slavery, suppressing discussions of systemic racism, and threatening...
The Public Harms of Private Surveillance
Abstract Private surveillance is rapidly reshaping public space. With inexpensive storage, widespread amplification, and integrated data sharing, modern surveillance networks operate with unprecedented scale, prevalence, and influence. Unlike the neighborhood watches of the past, these networks are always on, subjecting public movements to facial recognition from doorbell cameras, license plate...
Dependency Law: The Punishment of Performance
Abstract What does a family look like? In recent years, societal understandings have generally grown more inclusive of different kinds of familial structures, including queer families, blended families, interracial families, working mothers, and caregiving fathers. But traditional notions of family roles and expectations still loom large in public consciousness. Critical drivers of this...
The Objective Batson Standard: Can a New Step Three Address the Problem of Implicit Bias?
Abstract Washington courts have attempted to prevent the issues created by implicit bias in jury selection by adopting an objective Batson standard. However, since its adoption, Washington courts have failed to apply this “objective standard” in either (1) a consistent manner or (2) in a manner in line with the standard’s plain text and purpose. In fact, recent Washington appeals court decisions...
Predisposed: Race, Disability, and Death Investigations
Abstract Disability, preexisting conditions, or underlying conditions might seem like uncontroversial factors to cite when determining an individual’s cause of death. However, many death investigators have also cited these conditions in deaths caused by state violence or neglect. For example, a 2021 study found that medical examiners cited sickle cell trait, a gene mutation, as a cause or...
The Law of Racial Resentment
Abstract Racial resentment, stemming from perceptions that one racial group has unfairly lost opportunities to another, has profoundly shaped decades of affirmative action law. Affirmative action programs emerged in the 1960s to counteract racial discrimination and expand opportunities for racial minorities. However, some white applicants soon viewed these programs with resentment, believing they...
White Comfort and the Constitution
Abstract The psychological comfort of white Americans is essential to the sustenance of white supremacy. The relationship between white psychological comfort and the U.S. Constitution is rich, and yet it has gone almost entirely unexplored in legal scholarship. In fact, the term “white comfort” is grossly undertheorized in law journals; few even mention the phrase, and none define it in a context...
How Does an Immigrant Become an “American”? Exclusion and Assimilation in U.S. Naturalization Law
Ugly fears of unassimilated immigrants have persisted throughout American history, influencing immigration law for centuries. From Chinese exclusion in the late 1800s, to President Trump’s Muslim ban in 2017, to his continued emphasis on securing our borders today, American history is rich with examples of exclusionary immigration policies. Though many of these laws impose obstacles to entering...
Major Questions in the Plenary Power Domain
Immigration law has been described as a field of constitutional oddity. Under the plenary power doctrine, courts have deferred to government decisions on immigration policy that would plainly violate constitutional rights outside of the immigration context. Courts have wielded the plenary power doctrine as a tool of systemic racism, using it to uphold racially discriminatory immigration policies...
Privacy and the Impossibility of Borders
This Article argues that a meaningful conception of privacy renders borders illegitimate. For those present in a nation state without legal authorization, pursuit of their basic rights carries the real risk that identifying information collected will expose them to immigration enforcement. Such a phenomenon is becoming more real considering an expanding border enforcement apparatus that relies on...
Relational River: Arizona v. Navajo Nation & the Colorado
It is not every day the U.S. Supreme Court adjudicates a case about the water needs and rights of one of the Colorado River Basin’s thirty tribal nations and the trust relationship shared by that sovereign with the United States. Yet just that happened in Arizona v. Navajo Nation in June 2023. As explored in this Article, the Colorado is a relational river relied upon by roughly forty million...
A New Approach to Disability, “Mental Incapacity,” and the Right to Vote: Lessons from Abroad
The vast majority of U.S. states and many countries have laws disenfranchising those lacking “mental capacity.” Such laws discriminate against people with mental and intellectual disabilities. Based on international developments like the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, some countries, including Japan and Peru, have begun questioning the need for incompetence...
